Does anybody have any recommendations on a good scale that provides only 0.1 oz accuracy? Most of the scales I see sold by the derby web sites have 0.01 oz accuracy.
I think precise and precision (number of significant digits displayed) is meant in this context, rather than accurate and accuracy (how close the measurement is to the true, actual mass).birddog wrote:We like having a scale that is only accurate to 0.1 oz.
I can appreciate this logic. Would it be a satisfactory option to take a higher precision scale and mask significant digits past 0.1 ounce with, say, electrical tape?birddog wrote:That way, we don't have 90 cars going back and forth trying to hit 5.00 on a scale...
My understanding has been that less-precise scales tend to have greater capacity and coarser sensitivity, such as postal scales, such that 5 ounces is on the lower end of the scale's range. I wonder if repeatability of marginal results might be an issue with a less-sensitive scale. For example, we have seen situations where people put their car on a postal-type scale, then add adjustable ballast onto the scale to push the weight up to 5.1 ounces, then remove a bit of the adjustable ballast to stay within 5.0 ounces (a tip a la David Meade's book, p.89). Unfortunately the car comes back with the ballast installed and the reading is 5.1 ounces anyway and another iteration is required. Perhaps people are making adjustments at a level that is beyond the sensitivity of the scale?
You must use a scale that is consistent and has enough weight resolution to create your own cutoff point.
I was asked at my race, how much over weight we allow. My answer was, 5.00oz or less. We used 3 scales of the same brand and one 5 oz official race weight. The scales were zeroed and the car was either under or over. You got to cut it off somewhere. Repeat weigh ins were tolerated to point, we may make a rule this year.
Zeroing the scale produced a very repeatable result, and I didn't have to go through the complex procedure to calibrate.
Possible issue you could create however, is if the Pack resolves to 0.1oz, you could pass a car that weighs 5.04oz, however if they go onto district and they use a scale that resolves 0.01oz the car will be overweight as it will show as 5.04oz.
I know you are looking for a scale that resolves to 0.1oz, which this isn't, but we have been happy with the scale that Maximum Velocity sells.
While we are talking scales - I do not recommend having two scales at weigh in to expedite check-in. A helpful leader brought along an extra - identical scale. We cal'd both to the calibration weight, but just between the two locations of the weight station - we had a discrepancies in the thousandths digit as you could imagine - not what you need at checkin
- Master Pine Head
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 5:25 pm
- Location: Dr. Phillips, Florida
My Weigh iBalance 300 (i300) Old Will's Price: $32.90
MFR PN: SCMI300BLACK
Mode: Capacity: Resolution: Grams 300.0 g 0.1 g Ounces 10.580 oz 0.005 oz Pennyweights192.90 dwt0.05 dwt Carats 1500.0 ct 0.5 ct
http://www.oldwillknottscales.com/my-we ... e-300.html" target="_blank 300 gram capacity x 0.1 gram resolution
"In A Nutshell"
Power 3 AA Batteries (included) AC adapter (not included) Display Red, Backlit LCD Tare Feature Yes Hold Feature Yes Calibration Feature Yes Count Feature No Platform Size 5.9" x 5.4" Scale Size 8.1" x 6.1" x 1.5" Weighing Modes4
Case in point: We thought we would save time by checking some cars in prior to race day, and the remainder on race day. The cars were perfect on the pre-check day. It rained the next day. The next day after was race day. The cars pre-checked were all heavy from the change in humidity. They all had to be re-weighed to be fair.
Changes in the weather, as well as different scales, cause your weight to change.
Absolutely - but I think birddog is looking for a scale with less resolution to minimize trips to the scales in an attempt to get the "perfect" weight.SirStorm wrote:5 Js - everyone should always plan on adding and reducing weight during check-in.
FWIW - adjusting weight in hundredths will make no noticeable impact on time - have the kiddos spend their time on axle prep and alignment.
Interesting! How do you know that the issue wasn't related to the scale?SirStorm wrote:It rained the next day. [...] The cars pre-checked were all heavy from the change in humidity.
I ask because another (perhaps simpler) hypothesis is that something happened to the scale overnight. We have noticed, for example, that temperature changes affect the timer electronics. We have also found that the (extreme) action of baking unfinished blocks to intentionally drive out moisture only causes a change of a couple percent by weight.
But the fact still holds. You still want everyone held to the same standard, within your power.
This conversation makes me want to go back to the triple beam. They are just so expensive!
Agreed. As mentioned in Birddog's other post related to scales, the "same standard" is promoted by occasional checking and re-calibrating as necessary using a test weight. It's not clear from an earlier comment how often your unit calibrates using a calibration weight, but a calibration weight is surely cheaper than a beam scale!SirStorm wrote:But the fact still holds. You still want everyone held to the same standard, within your power.
I also purchased the appropriate calibration weight for my scale. So I can calibrate at will (200grams for this model)
My judges found the crowd walking on the gym floor and breathing on the scale messed with the readout. I left it up to them to make the call, they are judges after all. As Race Director I must delegate some things.
Ah, so that is what you meant by zeroing. Clever.SirStorm wrote:I purchased a 5 oz weight. [...] We would tare on this weight then if you got a minus you were under and if you got a plus you were over.
The participant wants to know how much, so they can add or subtract a little or alot. But for the ultimate purpose of inspection, it is a pass fail situation.
Interesting question is, does temperature and humidity effect the scales acurracy to measure or just the starting point. So, is it like a motorcycle speedometer, accurate at low speed, and lying outright at highway speeds?
That is why we don't use spring scales, right?
Interesting indeed. Out of fear of going too far off topic here (because this topic is mainly about recommending scales precise to 0.1 ounce), I started a new topic here.SirStorm wrote:Interesting question is... ?